Fragen? Antworten! Siehe auch: Alternativlos
But at least six of the submitted cases by Schwartz as research for a brief “appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations,” said Judge Kevin Castel of the Southern District of New York in an order.[...]
Schwartz, in an affidavit, said that he had never used ChatGPT as a legal research source prior to this case and, therefore, “was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false.” He accepted responsibility for not confirming the chatbot’s sources.
Einmal mit Profis arbeiten!Was mich ja an sowas am meisten ärgert, ist dass der die Arbeit, die er an ChatGPT outgesourced hat, natürlich seinem Klienten als eigene Leistung in Rechnung gestellt hat.