Fragen? Antworten! Siehe auch: Alternativlos
on "formidable evidence" asserting his innocence and "horrendous violations" of his rights, defense attorneys said in federal court papers filed this week.
Hmm, ja was denn so? Das hier!an expert analysis of recently uncovered evidence shows two guns were fired in the assassination and that Sirhan's revolver was not the gun that shot Kennedy.
OK, zugegeben, das wäre Grund für ein neues Verfahren. Aber es geht noch weiter:fraud was committed in Sirhan's 1969 trial when the court allowed a substitute bullet to be admitted as evidence for a real bullet removed from Kennedy's neck.
Äh … lolwut?! Oh und wer sich denkt, damit sei das Bizarrometer schon am Vollausschlag, der irrt:The attorneys further assert that Sirhan was hypno-programmed to be a diversion for the real assassin
o_O